Annals of Military and Health Sciences Research

Published by: Neoscriber Demo Publisher

The Comparison between Digital Subtraction Angiography, CT Angiography, and Doppler Ultrasonography in Evaluation and Assessment of Carotid Artery Stenosis

Amin Banaei 1 , 2 , *
Author Information
1 Department of Radiology, Faculty of Paramedical Sciences, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran
2 Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, IR Iran
Article information
  • Annals of Military and Health Sciences Research: March 2017, 15 (1); e61661
  • Published Online: March 31, 2017
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: February 5, 2017
  • Accepted: May 8, 2017
  • DOI: 10.5812/amh.61661

To Cite: Banaei A. The Comparison between Digital Subtraction Angiography, CT Angiography, and Doppler Ultrasonography in Evaluation and Assessment of Carotid Artery Stenosis, Ann Mil Health Sci Res. 2017 ;15(1):e61661. doi: 10.5812/amh.61661.

Abstract
Copyright: Copyright © 2017, Annals of Military and Health Sciences Research. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Methods
3. Results
4. Discussion
Footnote
References
  • 1. Caplan LR. Carotid-artery disease. 2017;
  • 2. Sobieszczyk P, Beckman J. Carotid artery disease. Circulation. 2006; 114(7)-7[DOI][PubMed]
  • 3. Sturzenegger M. Spontaneous internal carotid artery dissection: early diagnosis and management in 44 patients. J Neurol. 1995; 242(4): 231-8[PubMed]
  • 4. Biousse V, D'Anglejan-Chatillon J, Touboul PJ, Amarenco P, Bousser MG. Time course of symptoms in extracranial carotid artery dissections. A series of 80 patients. Stroke. 1995; 26(2): 235-9[PubMed]
  • 5. Chilcote WA, Modic MT, Pavlicek WA, Little JR, Furlan AJ, Duchesneau PM, et al. Digital subtraction angiography of the carotid arteries: a comparative study in 100 patients. Radiology. 1981; 139(2): 287-95[DOI][PubMed]
  • 6. Banaei A, Bijari S. Radiation Protection of Patients in Cardiac CT Angiography. Paramed Sci Mil Health. 2016; 11(3): 34-42
  • 7. Skoda O, Kalvach P, Prochazka B, Svarovsky M. Non-invasive evaluation of proximal vertebral artery stenosis using color Doppler sonography and CT angiography. J Neuroradiol. 2014; 41(5): 336-41[DOI][PubMed]
  • 8. Alvarez-Linera J, Benito-Leon J, Escribano J, Campollo J, Gesto R. Prospective evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR angiography and spiral CT angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2003; 24(5): 1012-9[PubMed]
  • 9. Silvennoinen HM, Ikonen S, Soinne L, Railo M, Valanne L. CT angiographic analysis of carotid artery stenosis: comparison of manual assessment, semiautomatic vessel analysis, and digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007; 28(1): 97-103[PubMed]
  • 10. Nederkoorn PJ, van der Graaf Y, Hunink MG. Duplex ultrasound and magnetic resonance angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography in carotid artery stenosis: a systematic review. Stroke. 2003; 34(5): 1324-32[DOI][PubMed]
  • 11. Grant EG, Benson CB, Moneta GL, Alexandrov AV, Baker JD, Bluth EI, et al. Carotid artery stenosis: gray-scale and Doppler US diagnosis--Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus Conference. Radiology. 2003; 229(2): 340-6[DOI][PubMed]
  • 12. Khan S, Cloud GC, Kerry S, Markus HS. Imaging of vertebral artery stenosis: a systematic review. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2007; 78(11): 1218-25[DOI][PubMed]
  • 13. Puchner S, Haumer M, Rand T, Reiter M, Minar E, Lammer J, et al. CTA in the detection and quantification of vertebral artery pathologies: a correlation with color Doppler sonography. Neuroradiology. 2007; 49(8): 645-50[DOI][PubMed]
  • 14. Khan S, Rich P, Clifton A, Markus HS. Noninvasive detection of vertebral artery stenosis: a comparison of contrast-enhanced MR angiography, CT angiography, and ultrasound. Stroke. 2009; 40(11): 3499-503[DOI][PubMed]
  • 15. Hua Y, Meng XF, Jia LY, Ling C, Miao ZR, Ling F, et al. Color Doppler imaging evaluation of proximal vertebral artery stenosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009; 193(5): 1434-8[DOI][PubMed]
  • 16. Yurdakul M, Tola M. Doppler criteria for identifying proximal vertebral artery stenosis of 50% or more. J Ultrasound Med. 2011; 30(2): 163-8[PubMed]
  • 17. Koch S, Romano JG, Park H, Amir M, Forteza AM. Ultrasound velocity criteria for vertebral origin stenosis. J Neuroimaging. 2009; 19(3): 242-5[DOI][PubMed]
  • 18. Farres MT, Grabenwoger F, Magometschnig H, Trattnig S, Heimberger K, Lammer J. Spiral CT angiography: study of stenoses and calcification at the origin of the vertebral artery. Neuroradiology. 1996; 38(8): 738-43[PubMed]
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .